Search This Blog

Active to passive conversion

 ðŸ”¹ Simple Present Tense


Structure:

Active: Subject + V₁ + Object

Passive: Object + is/am/are + V₃ + by + Subject


Examples:


1. He writes a letter. → A letter is written by him.

2. They make cakes. → Cakes are made by them.

3. I help my friend. → My friend is helped by me.


🔹 Present Continuous Tense


Structure:

Active: Subject + is/am/are + V₁-ing + Object

Passive: Object + is/am/are + being + V₃ + by + Subject


Examples:


1. She is reading a story. → A story is being read by her.

2. They are watching the movie. → The movie is being watched by them.

3. I am cleaning the room. → The room is being cleaned by me.


🔹 Present Perfect Tense


Structure:

Active: Subject + has/have + V₃ + Object

Passive: Object + has/have + been + V₃ + by + Subject


Examples:


1. He has completed the work. → The work has been completed by him.

2. They have finished the project. → The project has been finished by them.

3. I have written a letter. → A letter has been written by me.


🔹 Simple Past Tense


Structure:

Active: Subject + V₂ + Object

Passive: Object + was/were + V₃ + by + Subject


Examples:


1. He wrote a poem. → A poem was written by him.

2. They built a house. → A house was built by them.

3. She cleaned the room. → The room was cleaned by her.


🔹 Past Continuous Tense


Structure:

Active: Subject + was/were + V₁-ing + Object

Passive: Object + was/were + being + V₃ + by + Subject


Examples:

1. He was repairing the car. → The car was being repaired by him.

2. They were watching TV. → TV was being watched by them.

3. She was writing a letter. → A letter was being written by her.


🔹 Past Perfect Tense


Structure:

Active: Subject + had + V₃ + Object

Passive: Object + had + been + V₃ + by + Subject


Examples:


1. He had completed the work. → The work had been completed by him.

2. They had won the match. → The match had been won by them.

3. She had cooked dinner. → Dinner had been cooked by her.

🔹 Simple Future Tense


Structure:

Active: Subject + will/shall + V₁ + Object

Passive: Object + will/shall + be + V₃ + by + Subject


Examples:


1. He will finish the work. → The work will be finished by him.

2. They will build a bridge. → A bridge will be built by them.

3. I shall write a story. → A story shall be written by me.


🔹 Future Perfect Tense


Structure:

Active: Subject + will/shall + have + V₃ + Object

Passive: Object + will/shall + have been + V₃ + by + Subject


Examples:


1. He will have completed the work. → The work will have been completed by him.

2. They will have finished the task. → The task will have been finished by them.

3. I shall have written the letter. → The letter shall have been written by me.


Duchess of Malfi short summary

 Introduction

The Duchess of Malfi is a Jacobean revenge tragedy written by John Webster, first performed around 1613-1614 and published in 1623. Based loosely on historical events from early 16th-century Italy, the play explores themes of corruption, patriarchal oppression, forbidden love, madness, and the consequences of defying social hierarchies. Set in a morally decayed Italian court associated with Roman Catholic intrigue, it follows the widowed Duchess of Amalfi, who secretly marries her lower-class steward Antonio, defying her tyrannical brothers, Ferdinand (Duke of Calabria) and the Cardinal. Their opposition leads to betrayal, torture, and a bloody climax. Critically, the play is praised for its dense imagery, psychological depth, and critique of power structures, often seen as one of the last great tragedies of the Elizabethan-Jacobean era, rivaling Shakespeare in its exploration of human depravity and resilience.


Act 1

The play opens in the Duchess's palace in Amalfi, Italy, during the 16th century. Antonio Bologna, the Duchess's honest steward, returns from the French court and discusses with his friend Delio the virtues of a corruption-free government, contrasting it with the Italian court's moral decay. He describes the Duchess as noble and virtuous, while portraying her brothers—the scheming Cardinal and the volatile Ferdinand—as corrupt and envious. Bosola, a former convict and malcontent who spent seven years in the galleys for a murder likely commissioned by the Cardinal, arrives and bitterly complains about the brothers' ingratitude for his past services. Ferdinand hires Bosola as the Duchess's provisorship of horse (stable manager) but secretly tasks him with spying on her to prevent remarriage, fearing loss of her fortune and family honor. Bosola reluctantly accepts gold for the role, marking his descent into corruption.

The brothers warn the widowed Duchess against remarrying, emphasizing the shame it would bring to their noble bloodline. She outwardly agrees but privately confides in her maid Cariola her intent to defy them. Dismissing her brothers' patriarchal dictates, the Duchess inverts traditional gender roles by wooing and proposing to Antonio with her wedding ring. He accepts, and they exchange vows in a private ceremony witnessed by Cariola, making it legally binding. The act ends with the couple retiring to bed to "lie and talk together," while Cariola questions whether the Duchess's actions stem from greatness or madness.


Act 2

Approximately nine months later, the Duchess is secretly pregnant with Antonio's child. Bosola, spying for Ferdinand, suspects her condition and tests her by offering apricots (believed to induce labor in pregnant women). She eats them eagerly, confirming his suspicions as she soon goes into premature labor. To conceal the birth, Antonio fabricates a story of poisoning and locks the palace gates, claiming a thief is loose. In the chaos, Antonio accidentally drops a horoscope he made for the newborn son, which Bosola discovers and sends to the brothers in Rome as evidence of the Duchess's "loose" behavior.

In Rome, Ferdinand and the Cardinal react with fury to the news of the secret child, viewing it as a stain on their noble bloodline. Ferdinand rages about the Duchess's sexuality, imagining violent retribution but deciding to wait until he identifies the father. The Cardinal, meanwhile, maintains his affair with Julia, the wife of a courtier, highlighting his hypocrisy.

Act 3

Several years pass; the Duchess and Antonio now have three children. Bosola continues spying, informing Ferdinand of the additional births. Ferdinand sneaks into the Duchess's bedchamber at night, confronting her with a poniard (dagger) and urging suicide for her "whoredom." She defends her marriage but refuses to name Antonio. Enraged, Ferdinand vows never to see her again and flees. To escape, the Duchess publicly accuses Antonio of financial misconduct and banishes him, a ruse to allow his flight with their children. She confides the truth in Bosola, who feigns sympathy but reports to Ferdinand.

The family attempts to reunite at Loretto during a supposed pilgrimage, but the Cardinal banishes them. Antonio flees to Milan with their eldest son for safety, while Bosola, disguised as a soldier, arrests the Duchess and her younger children on Ferdinand's orders, escorting them back to Amalfi as prisoners.

Act 4

Imprisoned in her palace, the Duchess endures psychological torture orchestrated by Ferdinand, who avoids seeing her directly. In darkness, he gives her a dead man's hand (disguised as Antonio's) and shows wax figures mimicking the corpses of Antonio and their children, driving her to despair. He then unleashes madmen from a nearby asylum to torment her with nonsensical ravings. Bosola, disguised as a tomb-maker, informs her of her impending death. Executioners strangle the Duchess, her two younger children, and Cariola. Ferdinand, viewing the bodies, is overcome with remorse and madness, accusing Bosola of overzealousness and refusing payment. The Duchess briefly revives, learning from Bosola that Antonio lives, before dying permanently. Bosola, wracked with guilt, vows to seek redemption.

Act 5

In Milan, Antonio, unaware of the murders, seeks reconciliation with the brothers. Ferdinand, afflicted with lycanthropy (believing himself a wolf), raves madly from guilt. The Cardinal, covering his crimes, poisons his mistress Julia after she learns too much from Bosola's interrogation. Bosola, now seeking vengeance for the Duchess,plans to protect Antonio. In a chaotic night scene filled with mistaken identities, Bosola accidentally stabs Antonio in the dark. Dying, Antonio laments his family's fate. Bosola then attacks the Cardinal, stabbing him. Ferdinand enters, stabs both his brother and Bosola in confusion, and is fatally wounded by Bosola. As they die, Bosola reflects on the tragedy's roots in ambition and corruption. Delio arrives with Antonio's surviving son, vowing to establish an honest legacy for him.

Nobel Prize lecture by Maria Ressa Summary and Question Answers

 

Maria Ressa won the Nobel Prize for peace on 10 December 2021 . She spoke as a representative of journalists across the world who risk their lives to tell the truth.


Tribute to Journalists and Human Rights activists 


Ressa began her speech by remembering journalists like Jamal Khashoggi and Daphne Caruana Galizia, who were killed for their work. She also mentioned journalists imprisoned or forced to flee their countries. She thanked global human rights groups and the #HoldTheLine coalition(union) that support press freedom.

In the Philippines, many lawyers, human rights activists, and journalists have been killed or jailed since 2016, including Senator Leila de Lima. The government has also silenced major media houses like ABS-CBN (Corporation is a Filipino media company) .


Creation of Rappler


Maria Ressa co-founded Rappler, a digital news platform, to connect journalism and technology. She described these as two sides of a coin: journalism seeks truth, while technology, misused, spreads lies and hate. The internet has allowed false information to divide people and empower dictators.


Need for Truth and Goodness


Ressa said the greatest need today is to stop hate and violence spread online. She urged people to “believe there is good in the world” and to work for truth and compassion. Despite facing dangers, she has seen humanity’s kindness during disasters and crises, which she believes represents the best in human nature.


Nobel Prize Significance


The last journalist to receive this prize was Carl von Ossietzky in 1936, who died in a Nazi camp. Ressa said this new recognition shows that democracy again faces a critical moment. Many journalists continue to suffer without public support, while technology has worsened their struggles.


Ressa’s Personal Struggles

The Philippine government filed ten arrest warrants against her in less than two years. She was convicted of cyber libel and may face up to 100 years in prison. But the attacks only strengthened her resolve to fight for truth and free journalism.


Her Code of Ethics

Ressa said journalism is guided by a code of honor. She added her personal values — integrity, gratitude (utang na loob), and responsibility. She also warned that gender-based disinformation has become a new threat to women and LGBTQ+ journalists, causing serious mental and physical harm.


The Global Problem

Ressa identified two main forms of impunity(exemption from punishment:)


1. Political impunity — governments using violence and lies without punishment.


2. Technological impunity — social media companies spreading hate and misinformation for profit.


She reminded the world that “online violence is real-world violence.” Social media uses people’s private data for profit, manipulates behaviour, and weakens human freedom and democracy. Lies travel faster than truth, and this has created deep divisions worldwide.


Collapse of Truth and Trust

Ressa warned that when facts disappear, truth and trust collapse. Without trust, societies cannot solve global issues like climate change, pandemics, or political crises. She said the loss of integrity in facts destroys democracy itself.


Examples of Manipulation

She shared examples from the Philippines and other countries:


The Marcos family used social media to rewrite history and promote political power.


Fake accounts and AI-generated images were used to spread propaganda.

This shows how disinformation works both locally and globally to shape elections and public opinion.


Ressa compared the crisis in information to an “invisible atom bomb.” She called for new global institutions and laws — like the United Nations and Universal Declaration of Human Rights after World War II — to protect truth and humanity in the digital age.


Restoring Facts and Journalism

To rebuild democracy, Ressa urged:


Protection for journalists from state attacks.


Financial support for independent journalism through international funds.


Regulation of social media companies that profit from hate and lies.


She co-chairs the International Fund for Public Interest Media to raise global aid for journalism, especially in developing countries.


Role of Technology

Journalists should also learn to use technology ethically. With the help of the Google News Initiative, Rappler built a new platform that promotes facts and communities of action rather than viral misinformation. Technology, if used responsibly, can serve truth and democracy.


Defending Democracy and Values

Ressa said democracy now depends on individuals — each person must defend truth and moral values. The world stands at a “sliding door moment” — one path leads to fascism, the other to freedom. Everyone must decide what they are willing to sacrifice for truth.


Maria Ressa lives under constant threat of imprisonment, but she believes the fight is worth it. She ended her speech with hope — urging everyone to imagine and build a world based on peace, trust, and empathy.

Her final words were a powerful call:


 “Now let’s go and make it happen. Let’s hold the line. Together.”


Answer the following questions in two or three sentences


1. State the reason why Maria Ressa started Rappler.

Maria Ressa started Rappler to connect journalism and technology to seek truth and social welfare. She wanted to use journalism to strengthen democracy by providing truthful information and creating a space for people to speak freely and responsibly.


2. Describe what Maria Ressa identifies as the greatest need of today.

Maria Ressa believes the greatest need today is to protect the truth. Without truth, trust and democracy collapse, and people become victims of lies and manipulation spread through social media.


3. "By giving this to journalists today, the Nobel committee is signalling a similar historical moment." Explain.

Maria Ressa said this to show that journalists receiving the Nobel Peace Prize marks a turning point in history. It signifies that the world recognizes the importance of protecting truth and freedom of expression in an era when lies and hate are rapidly spreading online.


4. Which are the two sides of the coin mentioned by Maria Ressa?

The two sides of the coin are technology and journalism. Technology can connect people and spread truth, but it can also spread lies and hate; journalism must act as the balancing side to protect truth and human rights.



5. Explain why Maria Ressa was arrested.

Maria Ressa was arrested because she exposed corruption and abuse of power in the Philippines through her reports on Rappler. False charges were used against her as an attempt to silence her and weaken independent journalism.


6. Which impunity is addressed by Ressa?

Maria Ressa addressed two kinds of impunity — the political impunity of powerful leaders who commit crimes without punishment, and the impunity of social media platforms that spread lies and hatred without accountability.


Answer the following in a paragraph


1. Online violence is real world violence. Discuss.

Maria Ressa argues that online violence is not limited to the digital world; it has real consequences in people’s lives. Hate speech, fake news and online attacks can destroy reputations, spread fear, and even lead to physical harm. When lies are spread repeatedly online, they shape public opinion and justify real-world violence against individuals or communities. Therefore, online abuse must be treated as seriously as physical violence because both threaten safety, peace, and democracy.


2. Discuss the changes to be adopted by the journalists of the 21st century.

Journalists of the 21st century must adapt to a world dominated by technology and social media. They should learn to identify and fight against fake news and false information, verify facts before publishing, and use digital tools responsibly. Maria Ressa urges journalists to stay courageous, to stand for truth even when it is dangerous, and to rebuild public trust by maintaining transparency, accuracy, and integrity in their reporting.


3. What can be done to support independent journalism survive?

Independent journalism can survive through public support, international cooperation, and legal protection for journalists. Governments must ensure press freedom, and citizens must stand against fake news and value truthful reporting. Funding models such as reader subscriptions, global partnerships and media literacy education can also strengthen independent media and protect it from political or corporate influence.


1. Discuss the ways adopted by social media to manipulate truth.

Social media platforms often manipulate truth by prioritizing engagement over accuracy. Algorithms are designed to show users sensational or emotional content that increases clicks and shares, even if the information is false. It spreads faster than verified facts and divides people through hate and fear. Paid trolls and fake accounts are used to attack truth-tellers and silence critics. Maria Ressa explains that such manipulation weakens democracy because people make decisions based on lies. Therefore, digital platforms must be made accountable for the content they promote and transparent about how their algorithms work. Education in media literacy is also essential so that people can distinguish truth from propaganda.


2. Maria Ressa envisions a world of peace and trust. Examine the ways in which journalists can contribute to realising this vision.

Maria Ressa believes that peace and trust can only exist when truth is protected. Journalists play a key role in achieving this by standing up for facts, exposing corruption, and giving a voice to the voiceless. They must report responsibly, avoid bias, and verify every piece of information before publishing. By rejecting fear and propaganda, journalists can build bridges of understanding and fight hatred. Ressa also urges collaboration among journalists globally to defend press freedom and challenge authoritarian control. Through honest, courageous, and ethical reporting, journalists can help create a world where truth guides society and peace becomes possible.

To every Briton by M.K Gandhi - summary and Question answers

 

Mahathma Gandhi asks every Briton, wherever they are — to choose non-violence instead of war to settle international disputes. Although the war is presented as being fought for democracy, he warns that the methods being used will destroy genuine democracy itself.

War has become a curse that brutalises humanity and erases the distinction between soldiers and civilians. It also serves as a warning: if people ignore this lesson, human conduct will sink below dignity and resemble brutal and inhuman behaviour.

He calls for stopping hostilities not because Britain or India is weak, but because war is morally wrong. Trying to destroy Nazism by copying its methods will only spread the same inhumanity.

He does not want Britain defeated, nor does he want a victory based on sheer destructive power. Instead he proposes a nobler alternative: fight Nazism without arms — through non-violent resistance and refusal to obey or collaborate, even if it means suffering or death, but never surrendering one’s soul or mind.

For over fifty years he has practised non-violence consistently in many fields, and he believes it to be effective; where it seemed to fail he attributes that to his own faults, not to the method.

He asserts his sincere friendship for the British and explains that, though he once supported the British Empire, he now opposes imperialism by non-violent means. His appeal springs from universal love, of which the British are an important part.

He ends with a prayer that his words be strengthened and urges Britain’s leaders to respond with wisdom and courage. He also offers his services to the Government if they consider them useful for promoting his plea for non-violence.

I. Answer the following in two or three sentences

1. According to Gandhi, what will be the condition of democracy after war?
Gandhi believed that after the war, democracy would lose its true meaning. He warned that whichever side wins, the violence and hatred used in war would destroy the values and spirit that democracy stands for.

2. Discuss the reason why Gandhi called for an end to hostilities.
Gandhi urged for the termination of war not because Britain was weak, but because he considered war itself evil in nature. He felt that killing and destruction could never bring peace or justice.

3. List the major powers who were in opposition to the British during the Second World War.
The main powers opposing Britain during the Second World War were Germany, led by Adolf Hitler, and Italy, led by Benito Mussolini.

4. "You will give all these but neither your souls, nor your minds". Elaborate.
Gandhi meant that even if the British were forced to give up their land, homes, and possessions to their enemies, they should never surrender their conscience, faith, or moral principles. He urged them to preserve their inner freedom and dignity through non-violence.

5. How did Gandhi express his continued affection for the British people despite his opposition to imperialism?
Gandhi stated that he had always been a sincere friend of the British people. Though he opposed the British Empire’s rule over India, his method of resistance was non-violent, and his appeal for peace came from universal love, which included the British as well.


II. Answer the following in a paragraph

1. Evaluate how Gandhi viewed the war as a curse to humanity.
Gandhi considered war as a terrible curse that degraded human values and destroyed compassion. He observed that the war erased the line between soldiers and civilians, turning the whole of humanity into victims of violence. He condemned the cruelty and lies spread in the name of patriotism and democracy. According to Gandhi, war brutalized mankind and threatened to reduce human beings to the level of beasts. Therefore, he regarded war not only as a curse but also as a warning to humanity to change its ways.

2. The war cannot effectively combat Nazism through similar methods of destruction. Discuss.
Gandhi argued that it was impossible to destroy Nazism by adopting the same violent and ruthless methods used by the Nazis. He believed that if Britain fought with equal cruelty, it would only become like its enemy. True victory, according to Gandhi, should come from moral strength, not from physical destruction. He emphasized that a just cause cannot justify inhuman acts, and that peace can only be achieved through non-violence and moral courage.

3. Comment on Gandhi's experience of non-violence in life.
Gandhi had practised non-violence with great dedication for over fifty years in various spheres of life—social, political, and personal. He treated it as a scientific method for solving conflicts and believed that it had never failed when followed sincerely. Even when non-violence seemed unsuccessful, he attributed the failure to human weakness, not to the principle itself. For Gandhi, non-violence was both his way of life and his mission to discover and live by Truth, which he equated with God.


III. Essay Questions

1. Gandhi urges the Britons to adopt non-violence instead of war. What are the suggestions given by him to the Britons?
In his appeal To Every Briton, Gandhi urged the people of Britain to renounce war and embrace the path of non-violence. He advised them to stop hostilities not because they were tired or weak, but because war was wrong in its very essence. Gandhi asked them to resist Nazism without arms, through the moral power of non-violent resistance. He suggested that if Hitler or Mussolini took over their lands, the British should surrender their possessions but never their conscience or freedom of thought. He encouraged them to show courage by facing oppression peacefully, even at the cost of their lives. Gandhi believed that such noble suffering would awaken humanity’s conscience and bring true victory, which no weapon could achieve. His proposal was not born of ignorance but of deep experience—he had successfully used non-violence as a moral weapon throughout his life. Ultimately, Gandhi’s appeal was not only political but also spiritual: he urged the British to prove that moral strength was greater than physical force.

2. The philosophy of non-violence influenced many great thinkers in the twentieth century. Discuss the impact of the adoption of non-violence globally.
Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence became one of the most powerful moral forces of the twentieth century. It inspired movements for civil rights, peace, and social justice across the world. In the United States, Martin Luther King Jr. adopted Gandhi’s principles in his struggle against racial discrimination, leading to major civil rights reforms. In South Africa, Nelson Mandela drew inspiration from Gandhi’s methods to fight apartheid with a spirit of reconciliation. Leaders like César Chávez in America and Aung San Suu Kyi in Myanmar also followed similar ideals in their peaceful struggles. Beyond politics, Gandhi’s message influenced global peace movements and inspired people to resolve conflicts through dialogue and compassion. His vision of truth and non-violence continues to remind humanity that lasting peace cannot be built on hatred or destruction, but only on love, justice, and respect for human dignity.

Sayonara, Sayonara by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi - Question answers

 Answer the following questions in one or two sentences

1. What was the name of Totto-chan's new school?

The name of Totto-chan’s new school was Tomoe Gakuen.


2. Discuss the reason why Miyo-chan and her sister Misa-chan had to leave their home at night.

Miyo-chan and her sister Misa-chan had to leave their home at night because of the danger caused by bombing raids during the Second World War, which forced people to seek safer places.


3. What is the reason for evacuation?

The evacuation took place to protect people from air raids and bombings that destroyed homes, schools, and neighbourhoods during the war.


4. What was the childhood nickname of Tetsuko Kuroyanagi?

The childhood nickname of Tetsuko Kuroyanagi was Totto-chan.


Answer the following questions in a paragraph

1. Describe what happened to the people of Jiyugaoka.

During the Second World War, the peaceful town of Jiyugaoka turned into a scene of devastation. When the B29( The Boeing B-29 was the most advanced bomber of World War Two, and more expensive to design and build than the atomic bombs it dropped.) bombers attacked, fires spread rapidly and the entire neighbourhood was engulfed in flames. The residents had no choice but to abandon their homes and flee to safer areas. The once lively community, filled with children’s laughter and the daily activities of Tomoe Gakuen, was reduced to ashes. The destruction not only claimed buildings and possessions but also broke the emotional bond people had with their beloved surroundings.


2. Discuss the significance of the title “Sayonara, Sayonara!”

The title “Sayonara, Sayonara!” meaning “Goodbye, Goodbye!” holds deep emotional and symbolic significance. It marks Totto-chan’s farewell to her cherished school, Tomoe Gakuen, which was destroyed during the war. The repetition of the word “Sayonara” expresses the pain of parting and the sense of loss felt by the children and teachers. It also reflects the end of a precious chapter in Totto-chan’s childhood, representing how war abruptly separated innocent children from the joy, learning, and warmth of their school life. Thus, the title becomes a gentle but painful farewell to a world that could never be rebuilt in the same way again.


3. Evaluate the difference between Tomoe Gakuen and a conventional school.

Tomoe Gakuen was remarkably different from ordinary schools. Instead of rigid discipline and strict rules, it encouraged creativity, curiosity, and individuality. The classrooms were converted railway carriages where learning was joyful and interactive. The headmaster, Mr. Kobayashi, believed in education through freedom and respect, allowing students to explore nature, express ideas, and learn at their own pace. Conventional schools, on the other hand, often followed formal methods that limited children’s imagination. Tomoe Gakuen was thus a symbol of progressive education, where children were valued as unique individuals rather than as learners bound by rules.


Essay 1: The Second World War changed the life of Totto-chan incomparably. Discuss the impact of war on the life of Totto-chan.


The Second World War brought an absolute change in Totto-chan’s life. It marked the end of her joyful days at Tomoe Gakuen. Before the war, Totto lived in a world of freedom, innocence, and discovery under the guidance of Headmaster Kobayashi. Her school was not merely a place of learning but a nurturing space that shaped her character and imagination. However, the outbreak of war shattered this peaceful world. The air raids destroyed her school — the railway-car classrooms that once echoed with laughter and song were reduced to ashes by the B29 bombers.


This destruction was more than physical; it was deeply emotional. The school had been a place where Totto-chan found acceptance and joy after being misunderstood elsewhere. Its loss meant losing a part of her identity and happiness. The headmaster’s dream of creating a unique educational heaven was also crushed, though he remained hopeful about rebuilding it after the war. The war not only took away Totto’s beloved school but also forced her to confront the harsh realities of life—fear, separation, and displacement. Like many other children of wartime Japan, she learned that innocence could not be protected from the cruelty of war.

Despite the sorrow, Totto-chan’s experiences during this time shaped her understanding of resilience and compassion. Her memories of Tomoe Gakuen remained a guiding light, influencing her later life and inspiring her to write the book Totto-chan: The Little Girl at the Window. The war, therefore, transformed her from a playful child into someone aware of life’s fragility, giving her story a lasting emotional depth that continues to move readers around the world.


Essay 2: Children are the most vulnerable ones during wartime. Comment.


Children are indeed the most vulnerable victims of war, as they bear emotional and physical scars far beyond their years. During wartime, they lose not only their homes and schools but also their sense of safety and stability. Their innocent world is replaced by fear, hunger, displacement, and loss. Unlike adults, children cannot comprehend the reasons behind such destruction; they only experience its pain.


In Totto-chan: The Little Girl at the Window, this vulnerability is deeply felt. The war robbed Totto and her friends of their beloved school, a place that nurtured joy and creativity. The bombing raids forced children like Miyo-chan and Misa-chan to flee their homes at night, exposing them to fear and uncertainty. Such experiences leave a lasting impact on their minds and emotions, altering their perception of life.


Throughout history, wars have deprived children of education, family warmth, and the carefree days of childhood. They are often displaced, orphaned, or traumatized by violence they neither caused nor understood. The innocence of children makes them defenseless against such cruelty. Therefore, the story of Totto-chan reminds us that the greatest tragedy of war is not merely the loss of buildings or land but the destruction of childhood itself. Protecting children from the horrors of conflict is one of humanity’s greatest moral responsibilities, for they represent the hope and peace that the world so desperately needs.

I Will Marry When I Want - Question answers

 I. Answer the following in two or three sentences

1. Why did Ahab Kioi come to Kiguunda's home?

Ahab Kioi came to Kiguunda’s home, along with his wife Jezebel, to persuade Kiguunda and Wangeci to have a church wedding. His real intention, however, was to manipulate Kiguunda into mortgaging his land so that Ahab’s company could acquire it for the construction of a factory. The visit was a disguise for economic exploitation rather than goodwill.


2. Who is John Mahuuni?

John Mahuuni is the son of Ahab Kioi wa Kanoru, a wealthy businessman and landowner. He develops romantic feelings for Kiguunda’s daughter, Gathoni, but his relationship with her later reveals the hypocrisy and moral corruption of the upper class.


3. Why did Kiguunda get angry at Gathoni?

Kiguunda became angry at Gathoni when she revealed that her new modern appearance and lifestyle were influenced by John Mahuuni. He saw this as a rejection of traditional Gikuyu customs and an embrace of Western culture.


4. I Will Marry When I Want was written in which language?

The play I Will Marry When I Want was originally written in Kikuyu (Gikuyu) language and later translated into English by NgÅ©gÄ© wa Thiong’o and NgÅ©gÄ© wa MÄ©riÄ©.


5. What happened to Kiguunda at the end of the play?

At the end of the play, Kiguunda loses his land after mortgaging it to secure a bank loan for the church wedding. When he realizes he has been deceived by Ahab Kioi and the church, he becomes violent, but is brutally beaten by the police. The ending symbolizes the continued oppression of the poor under neocolonial systems.


II. Answer the following in a paragraph of about 100 words each


1. How does the play depict the clash between traditional values and Western materialism?

The play realistically portrays the conflict between traditional Gikuyu customs and Western-influenced materialism. Kiguunda and Wangeci represent the working-class people who uphold traditional values, while Ahab Kioi and his wife Jezebel embody the Westernized elite who exploit religion and capitalism to control others. The insistence on a church wedding shows how Western customs have replaced traditional practices, devaluing indigenous identity. Through Gathoni’s fascination with modern fashion and Kiguunda’s loss of land, the play exposes how Western materialism corrupts family bonds, cultural pride, and perpetuates class divisions in postcolonial Kenya.


2. Why did Kiguunda get ready for the church marriage?

Kiguunda agreed to the church wedding mainly under pressure from his wife, Wangeci, and the belief that it would help secure a better future for their daughter, Gathoni. They hoped that by accepting Christian marriage, they would gain social approval from the wealthy Kioi family and possibly strengthen Gathoni’s relationship with John. However, their decision reflects the deep influence of neocolonial values, where the poor adopt Western traditions to gain acceptance, even at the cost of their own cultural identity and economic security.


3. Comment on the neocolonial influence in the play.

The play strongly criticizes the neocolonial system in post-independence Kenya, where the local elite, allied with Western corporations and the church, continue to exploit the working class. Ahab Kioi and Ikuua represent African capitalists who collaborate with foreign companies to exploit native land and labour. The church and banks serve as tools of control, encouraging poor people like Kiguunda to embrace Western customs while trapping them in economic dependency. Ngũgĩ reveals that political independence has not freed Kenya from foreign domination; instead, it has created a new alliance between the native bourgeoisie and Western imperialism.



4. Mention the traditional Gikuyu customs that are highlighted in the play.

The play highlights several aspects of traditional Gikuyu culture, such as the indigenous marriage ceremony between Kiguunda and Wangeci, which symbolizes communal unity and cultural authenticity. The Gitiiro dance and songs performed during Gicaamba’s wedding recall the vibrant oral and musical traditions that celebrate collective identity. Traditional land ownership and farming are shown as vital sources of pride and independence. These customs stand in contrast to the Westernized lifestyle of the elite.


III. Answer the following in an essay of about 300 words each


1. Discuss the use of language, symbolism, and other theatrical techniques in the play I Will Marry When I Want.


NgÅ©gÄ© wa Thiong’o and NgÅ©gÄ© wa MÄ©riÄ© employ language, symbolism, and theatrical devices to powerfully express social injustice and cultural alienation in I Will Marry When I Want. The play was first written in Gikuyu to connect directly with the Kenyan working class and peasantry, making language itself a political act of decolonization. By rejecting English, NgÅ©gÄ© restores dignity to indigenous culture and asserts linguistic independence from colonial influence.


Symbolism plays a central role throughout the play. Kiguunda’s title deed represents not only his economic independence but also the effect of stolen African land. When he mortgages it to the bank, it becomes a symbol of neocolonial exploitation, as the elite use religion and financial institutions to exploit the poor. The church wedding symbolizes cultural betrayal and the internalization of colonial values, while Gathoni’s transformation under John’s influence reflects attraction of the youth towards the modern culture.


The use of songs and dances, especially Gitiiro, embodies the communal spirit of traditional Kenya, contrasting with the capitalist individualism of the rich. These musical interludes function as both political commentary and dramatic relief, allowing the audience to reflect on themes of oppression and resistance. Satire and irony are also employed to expose the hypocrisy of the elite, especially in the scenes where Ahab and Jezebel pretend to be moral guardians while exploiting the poor.


NgÅ©gÄ©’s blending of realism with indigenous performance traditions transforms the stage into a space of resistance. Through local idioms, folk songs, and proverbs, the playwright creates a politically charged theatre that speaks to the conscience of the nation. The play, therefore, is not just a story—it is an act of cultural reclamation and political awakening.



2. How does the play portray the continued influence of Western powers and their economic and cultural dominance after independence?


I Will Marry When I Want reveals that even after getting independence Kenya is not free from the foreign domination; it merely changed its form. The Western powers continue to exert control through economic, religious, and cultural institutions that enslave the poor psychologically and financially. NgÅ©gÄ© wa Thiong’o and NgÅ©gÄ© wa MÄ©riÄ© depict this through the alliance between the local elite, represented by Ahab Kioi and Ikuua wa Nditika, and multinational corporations that exploit the land and labour of ordinary citizens.


The church in the play becomes an instrument of neocolonial control, preaching submission and promoting Western customs under the guise of spirituality. By convincing Kiguunda to remarry in the church, the elite manipulate religion to legitimize their exploitation. Similarly, the bank that lends money to Kiguunda uses his land as collateral, leading to his dispossession. This reflects how capitalist systems trap the poor in cycles of debt and dependency.


Culturally, Western influence is evident in Gathoni’s admiration for modern fashion and her detachment from traditional Gikuyu values. Her relationship with John Mahuuni represents how the poor are deceived by the false promises of modernity and social mobility. NgÅ©gÄ© exposes that even after independence, the ruling class mimics colonial attitudes, continuing to oppress their fellow citizens for personal gain.


The play’s ending—where Kiguunda loses his land and dignity—symbolizes the fate of postcolonial Africa, where political freedom has failed to translate into economic justice or cultural autonomy. NgÅ©gÄ©’s message is clear: real liberation must begin with reclaiming cultural identity, rejecting blind imitation of the West, and uniting the working people against both foreign and local oppressors. The play thus stands as a powerful critique of neocolonialism and a call for true social and cultural emancipation.

Summary of Thirty Days in September by Mahesh Dattani - Question Answers

 

Summary of Thirty Days in September by Mahesh Dattani

Mahesh Dattani’s Thirty Days in September is a powerful psychological drama that exposes the long-term trauma of child sexual abuse and consequence. The play revolves around Mala Khatri, her mother Shanta, and her uncle (Shanta’s brother). Through a series of therapy sessions, flashbacks, and confrontations, Dattani portrays how silence, guilt, and denial destroy lives, and how confronting truth becomes the only way to healing.

 

Act I

The play opens with Mala’s conversation with her counsellor. She introduces herself hesitantly, unsure of her identity and burdened with guilt. She blames herself for everything that happened to her as a child, repeatedly saying “It must be my fault.” This recorded conversation sets the tone of her fractured psyche and self-blame.

The action shifts to Mala’s relationship with Deepak, a sincere young man who loves her but cannot understand her emotional instability. Mala often engages in short-term affairs—each lasting about thirty days—before feeling disgusted and leaving. Deepak urges her to seek professional help, suggesting she might need psychiatric support.

Meanwhile, Shanta, her deeply religious mother, lives in denial, taking refuge in prayers to Krishna instead of addressing the past. She avoids any confrontation with painful realities.

A key scene introduces Deepak visiting Shanta when Mala is away. He wants to understand Mala’s behavior and help her heal. Shanta initially hesitates to talk, fearing her daughter’s anger, but gradually opens up. She reveals Mala’s pattern of lies and restlessness but defends her fiercely, claiming she only prays for her daughter’s happiness.

As their conversation progresses, Shanta receives a terrifying phone call from Mala, realizing that Mala has discovered Deepak’s visit. The moment is filled with panic—indicating Mala’s fragile emotional state and the tension between mother and daughter.

Act I ends with Mala’s haunting recorded confession: she believes she was “born that way,” destined for suffering and abuse. Her voice fades into guilt and silence, while her mother continues her prayers—symbolizing the unspoken trauma between them.

Act II

Act II begins in the counsellor’s office again. Mala is now calmer and more self-aware, indicating progress in her therapy. She speaks confidently, using her full name—Mala Khatri—and declares that she has nothing to hide anymore. The turning point comes when she says, “It wasn’t my fault,” showing her movement toward healing and empowerment.

Her taped voice from earlier sessions interweaves with the live dialogue, revealing the root of her trauma: sexual abuse by her uncle when she was a child. She had internalized guilt for years, that she was “born bad.” The therapist’s sessions help her recognize that she was a victim, not the cause.

Mala describes her new sense of freedom—how she can finally feel sensations, enjoy life, and love Deepak genuinely. However, her peace is disturbed when she learns that her uncle is returning to Delhi to stay with them.

The Return of the Uncle

In a tense domestic scene, Shanta and Mala sit nervously as they await the uncle’s arrival. Shanta, unaware of the depth of Mala’s trauma, insists that he is a good man who has helped them financially after Mala’s father left. It is revealed that the money they had received for years was from the uncle, not from Mala’s estranged father. Shanta had lied to protect her daughter from more pain, never realizing that the very man who supported them was her daughter’s abuser.

The uncle enters, bringing an envelope—the title deed of their flat—as a “gift” to his sister. He claims he wants to ensure their security and proposes that after Mala’s marriage to Deepak, he will use her room whenever he visits Delhi. Mala interprets this gesture as an attempt to “buy silence” from both women.

The situation erupts into confrontation. Mala accuses her mother of knowing about the abuse all along but choosing to remain silent. She recounts the horrifying memories: the uncle locking her in the bedroom every day for “fifteen minutes” during summer holidays—fifteen minutes that ruined her entire life. Shanta breaks down but continues to deny complete awareness, insisting she “forgot” or “did not understand.”

The Mother’s Silence

In a shattering monologue, Mala recalls how every time she tried to speak, her mother would feed her alu parathas to silence her pain. Food became a substitute for comfort and a symbol of avoidance. She screams at her mother for praying to God while ignoring her suffering, yelling, “You were never there for me! You were too busy praying!”

The confrontation escalates as Mala demands her mother to remember. Shanta, cornered and trembling, finally confesses the truth of her own childhood trauma. She reveals that she too had been abused by the same brother when she was only six years old. For ten years, she endured the same pain and silence. Her way of coping had been through suppression—by becoming numb, prayerful, and mute.

In a moment of emotional collapse, Shanta says that her “tongue was cut off years ago” — she had lost the ability to speak out against injustice. Overwhelmed with guilt, she grabs a shard of glass from the broken picture of Krishna and injures herself. Mala rushes to her side, crying and holding her mother as Deepak calls for help.

The play circles back to the opening scene in the counsellor’s office. Mala now speaks with calm dignity. It is February 29th, 2004—a symbolic “extra day” that she calls her Freedom Day. Her abuser is dead. She declares she will celebrate the day with her husband Deepak. Her tone is one of triumph and emotional release.

In a deeply moving closing monologue, Mala speaks directly to her mother in the temple:

“It just isn’t easy to forget. But it doesn’t matter. He as a person is not important anymore. While I accused you of not recognizing my pain, I never recognized yours.”

The play ends with Mala kneeling beside Shanta in prayer, saying, “It’s not your fault, mother. Just as it wasn’t my fault.” Shanta continues her prayers silently, but Mala rests her head in her lap, symbolizing reconciliation and the first step toward generational healing.

 

I. Answer the following in two or three sentences

1. What social taboo does Dattani confront in the play?

Mahesh Dattani confronts the taboo of child sexual abuse within the family—a subject often silenced and ignored in Indian society. He exposes how victims are forced into guilt and secrecy, while society avoids acknowledging such crimes to maintain family honour.

2. Why did Shanta neglect Mala's complaint?

Shanta neglected Mala’s complaint because she herself had been a victim of her brother’s abuse in childhood and had chosen silence as a means of survival. Her deep psychological repression and dependence on religious faith prevented her from accepting the truth about her daughter’s suffering.

3. Where did Mala meet Deepak for the first time?

Mala met Deepak for the first time at a friend’s party. They were immediately drawn to each other and soon began a relationship, which later revealed Mala’s emotional conflicts and her inability to sustain love due to her past trauma.

4. Why is Mala ready to reveal her name?

Mala is ready to reveal her real name because she has overcome her guilt and shame. After years of therapy, she realizes that the abuse was not her fault and that her abuser should be the one to hide in shame, not her.

5. How did Mala react to the questions posed by Deepak?

Mala reacts with anger, fear, and confusion to Deepak’s questions. She finds it difficult to trust him or express her true feelings. Her emotional instability reflects her inner trauma and her fear of intimacy caused by years of abuse and betrayal.

II. Answer the following in about 100 words each

1. What is the central theme of the play?

The central theme of Thirty Days in September is child sexual abuse and its lifelong psychological effects on victims. Mahesh Dattani explores the deep emotional scars left by incest, guilt, and societal silence. The play also highlights the cycle of denial that passes from one generation to another, as seen in Mala and her mother, Shanta. Through the process of confession and therapy, the play emphasizes that healing begins only when silence is broken and the truth is confronted with courage and compassion.

2. Discuss the significance of the title "Thirty Days in September".

The title Thirty Days in September symbolizes Mala’s recurring pattern of short-lived relationships, each lasting for thirty days before she ends them. It reflects her inability to form lasting emotional bonds due to her traumatic past. The number also signifies the cyclic nature of her pain and guilt, which repeats every month like the days of September. At a deeper level, the title suggests the limited period of her control over relationships and the temporary escape she finds before the memories of abuse return to haunt her.

3. Comment on the importance of the mother–daughter relationship in the play.

The relationship between Shanta and Mala lies at the heart of the play. Both women are victims of the same man—Shanta’s brother—but are bound by silence, guilt, and misunderstanding. Shanta’s denial of Mala’s suffering deepens her daughter’s trauma, while Mala’s anger stems from her mother’s failure to protect her. In the end, when both realize their shared pain, their mutual understanding and forgiveness begin the healing process. The relationship symbolizes generational trauma and reconciliation through truth.

4. Analyze the character of Mala Khatri.

Mala Khatri is the protagonist of the play—a modern, successful, yet emotionally broken woman. Outwardly confident, she carries deep scars of childhood sexual abuse by her uncle. Her self-destructive pattern of brief affairs shows her struggle for the control of personal life. Through therapy and support from Deepak, she gradually learns to accept that she was a victim, not the cause of her suffering. By the end of the play, Mala emerges as a symbol of courage and healing, reclaiming her identity and self-worth.

 

III. Answer the following in about 300 words each

1. Thirty Days in September addresses the issue of societal silence around sexual abuse. Comment.

Mahesh Dattani’s Thirty Days in September boldly confronts one of the most suppressed issues in Indian society,sexual abuse within the family. The play exposes how victims are silenced by guilt, fear, and the pressure to protect the honor of the family. Through the story of Mala and her mother, Shanta, Dattani shows how silence becomes a weapon of oppression, forcing generations to live with hidden trauma.

Mala’s uncle abuses her when she was a child, but the real tragedy lies in her mother’s refusal to acknowledge it. Shanta’s silence is not just ignorance but a continuation of her own trauma; she too was abused by the same man when she was a child. This cycle of silence and denial becomes a central theme of the play.

Dattani’s use of therapy sessions, recorded tapes, and fragmented memories reveals the psychological depth of abuse and the struggle to articulate it. The counsellor’s unseen presence symbolizes society’s need to listen, while the tapes represent the process of speaking the unspeakable.

Through Mala’s journey—from shame and confusion to empowerment—Dattani urges society to break the silence surrounding sexual abuse. The play calls for empathy, awareness, and open dialogue instead of denial. It insists that confronting truth, however painful, is the first step toward freedom. In doing so, Dattani transforms a private trauma into a public call for social awakening.

2. Elaborate on the role of memory in the play. How does the play use dramatic devices to convey its message?

Memory plays a crucial role in Thirty Days in September, functioning as both a source of pain and a path to healing. The entire play revolves around Mala’s fragmented recollections of childhood abuse and her gradual confrontation with those buried memories. Each remembered moment brings her closer to understanding herself and the root of her suffering.

Dattani uses powerful dramatic devices to represent the working of memory. The recorded counselling sessions, flashbacks, and overlapping dialogues recreate the disjointed rhythm of trauma. The use of lighting and stage areas such as the prayer room, the counsellor’s space, and the living room symbolizes different layers of memory and repression.

The recurring image of the broken portrait of Krishna reflects shattered faith and the illusion of purity within the family. The taped voice of Mala from the past contrasts sharply with her confident present self, showing her emotional transformation.

Through these devices, Dattani portrays memory not just as a recollection of events but as a process of rediscovery and liberation.